Laia Petretic vs Gloria De Santis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Sep at 11:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Petretic vs G. De Santis

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Petretic 1 - 0 Santis
They have played 3 sets in total, with Laia Petretic winning 2 and Gloria De Santis winning 1. The last match between Laia Petretic and Gloria De Santis was at the W15 Viserba, 11-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Laia Petretic getting the victory 4-6 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Petretic | 1 |
| Santis | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Viserba(09-11-25)
L. Petretic vs G. D. Santis H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 48.72% (95-100) | Career Total W/L | 42.86% (6-8) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Petretic vs G. D. Santis Match Preview:
- Recent second serve statistics favor Santis, with 48.28% of points won compared to Petretic's 39.35%. Might this indicate a serving edge for Santis?
- Petretic excels in return games, claiming 51.22% of points on their opponent's second serves versus Santis's 41.38%. Is return capability a decisive factor in this matchup?
- On first serve returns, Petretic leads with 41.22% compared to 39.02% for Santis.
- Under pressure, Petretic saves 45.81% of breakpoints, slightly outperforming Santis's 42.86%.
- Petretic's yearly win rate is higher at 53.85% compared to Santis's 42.86%.
- Petretic performs best on hard courts with a career win rate of 51%, while Santis's strongest surface is clay with a 44% win rate. Could surface preference play a role here?
- Petretic has a higher win rate at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, triumphing in 56.52% of matches, while Santis wins 40% of the time.
- Petretic has faced opponents with an average rank of 416.35, while Santis's opponents don't provide a comparable rank, suggesting different levels of competition.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Santis has a perfect outcome of 100% wins, whereas Petretic wins 67%.
- In breakpoint scenarios, Santis has a significant advantage, converting 75% compared to Petretic's 42.7%.
Editorial Prediction (September 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Petretic and Santis showcases contrasting strengths. Santis dominates in second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, indicating a potential edge in service games.
Conversely, Petretic stands out in return statistics, particularly against opponents' second serves. This return prowess could neutralize Santis’s serving advantage.
Petretic's consistent performance on hard surfaces may also offer an advantage, despite Santis's impeccable deciding set record.
Considering the breadth of performance indicators and recent statistics, Petretic seems to have a slight overall advantage, likely leading to a victory in this encounter.
Laia Petretic vs Gloria De Santis Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Petretic vs G. D. Santis H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 9 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:50:20 | Average Match Time | 2:50:20 |
| 68% (55/81) | 1st Serve % | 66% (73/111) |
| 64% (35/55) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (35/73) |
| 46% (12/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (15/38) |
| 47% (8/17) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (4/8) |
| 55% (61/111) | Return Points Win % | 42% (34/81) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Petretic Recent Matches Played
G. D. Santis Recent Matches Played

L. Petretic vs G. D. Santis Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 48.72% (95/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 42.86% (6/8) |
| 48.64% (214/226) | Sets Win/Loss | 42.42% (14/19) |
| 49.67% (1956/1982) | Games Win/Loss | 47.50% (152/168) |
| 50.72% (35/34) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 49.18% (60/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.00% (4/6) |
| 0.00% (0/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.01 |
| 125 | Aces Total | 1 |
| 0.39 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 750 | Total Double Faults | 13 |
| 1:32:34 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 443.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 177.93 |
| 67% (7341/11038) | 1st Serve % | 61% (106/173) |
| 56% (4103/7341) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (56/106) |
| 42% (1541/3697) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (29/67) |
| 51% (767/1512) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 58% (7/12) |
| 48% (5439/11382) | Return Points Win % | 41% (62/151) |
| 42.59% (23/31) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 51.06% (72/69) | Futures W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 49% (95/193) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 50% (12/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 54% (28/52) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (3/5) |
| 86% (94/81) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (4/3) |
| 14% (94/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (4/1) |
| 14% (101/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (10/3) |